-
Jul 15, 2025
-
Harrrison Carroll

Will AI be a substitute for notaries public? This question has been popping up recently in the notary community. The continued growth of artificial intelligence (AI) has produced debates across many business sectors. This includes industries like medical, legal, education, construction, and finance. One profession that has faced these questions is that of the notary public. Since remote notarization is becoming more prevalent, many wonder whether AI will become a substitute for notaries altogether. It isn’t as simple as it looks. At Notary New York, we train people to pass the New York Notary Exam.
The Role of a Notary
A notary public’s main role is to act as an impartial witness to the signing of documents. They verify the identity of a signer. They ensure that parties are willing and understand the document. The idea is to prevent fraud. These tasks might seem procedural. And to some extent, they are. That’s why the idea of replacing notaries with AI or automated systems has gained traction. This is especially true (as mentioned above) with the growth of remote online notarization (RON). To learn more about Remote Notarization, visit the New York Department of State.
AI and Document Verification
AI can certainly streamline document verification. It can be used for facial recognition and identity checks with remarkable speed and accuracy. There are areas that already exist that use AI to assist in verifying government-issued IDs. They can compare them with a person’s facial image through video. These tools can clearly reduce the potential for human error. In addition, they can operate 24/7. In a digital-first world, AI could, in theory, process notarizations faster and more conveniently than any human ever could.
AI Fully Substituing for a Notary is Unlikely
However, while AI can assist notaries, full replacement is highly unlikely in the near term for several reasons.
First, there’s a legal framework that protects the integrity of the notary’s role. Laws in most states require a licensed human notary to perform or supervise notarizations. This remains true even when notarization is done online. The human element can provide a layer of discretion and judgment that AI, as of now, cannot fully duplicate. This is mainly true when dealing with complex or emotionally charged situations. For example, only a human can determine whether someone is signing a document under duress. Such a situation requires a degree of human insight.
Second, trust is a critical factor. Many people feel more secure when a real person handles legal or official matters. This is particularly so in situations involving real estate transactions, wills, or power of attorney. Comfort with technology continues to grow. But there’s still a long way to go. The desire for human oversight in major decisions still remains high. An example of this would be the use of a credible witness in the notary process.
Third, ethical and technical limits of technology still hinder complete automation. Data privacy concerns and the possibility of AI being exploited raise all kinds of red flags. Regulatory agencies are very cautious about allowing AI to assume legal responsibilities without a clear framework for accountability.
Instead of replacing notaries, AI is more likely to aid in their work. It can reduce administrative burdens. It can automate repetitive checks and help notaries serve clients more efficiently. Rather than eliminating the role, AI will likely shift it. It could eventually move notaries into more supervisory and consultative functions. This seems to make sense, especially in complex transactions.
Conclusion
In conclusion, to answer the question, ” Will AI Be a Substitute for Notaries,” let me say, while AI will continue to affect the way notarial services are done, it is not likely to fully replace notaries anytime soon. The future will likely see a mixed model. This would be where AI supports, rather than supplants. Take, for example, signing agents. They may often be required to be at a specific place at a specific time.
Comments are closed.